What is art free essay sample

Art cannot be defined simply, there has been numerous definitions offered throughout the decades but it is if I may, impossible to pin point one that define art perfectly because it is so broad. If I had to define all that art is will probably exceed an essay, but a book will do Just fine. Since we cannot cover all that art Is In one essay, we will cover the main ideas about It. Paintings, photography, architecture, and sculptures, they are the basics of art, and then there are others that define some as art, and some will reject those as art.Such as personal art, In which they might mean an Infinite amount personally, but It may only be something very common to the critiques of others. Art Is a personal definition All that art Is may not always be art. For example, art Is freedom of expression, It brings Joy, sadness, and It takes a person though the emotion of the artist. We will write a custom essay sample on What is art? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page It creates clarity and confusion but clarity and confusion Is not art. Art Is an escape but escape is not art. Art is creativity but creativity is not art.Art can make you smile and laugh, one of my favorite artists named Roomer Britton gives me great ay when I see his art, its colorful and not everyone can do, the creative ways in which he uses lines, color, etc. His art has purposes; they are displayed in childrens hospitals. Art is meaningful. Some art takes you too certain place or time, whether youve been there before or not. Art can be a memory, whether it is a happy or sad one, it makes you remember the emotion you were in while you created the certain piece or it might help you understand the emotion of the artist, the things they were going through and their thoughts.Art is nostalgic. Art helps you get through painful times and in the pain raises brilliant works. One can very well argue that those are the only good that comes out of tragedy, art includes experience and an individual can confine in art while they have no one else to confine with. Art is therapy. Although this is not all that art is but it is what relates to most of us and it is something in which most of us can relate to. Art is personal and global at the same time. It might only be understood by one person, although it might very well be understood globally.

The Many Faces of Run

The Many Faces of Run The Many Faces of Run The Many Faces of Run By Maeve Maddox A reader has asked about the correct use of the words run vs. ran. Run is one of those words that can be either a noun or a verb. As a verb, the principal parts of run are: run, ran, (have) run. Today I run. Yesterday I ran. I have run for twenty minutes. NOTE: In some dialects run is used instead of ran as simple past form: He run out of the cafà © in a hurry. In my part of the country I often hear ran used instead of run for the past participle: I have ran three miles. Merriam-Webster offers an interesting historical observation: The past tense run still survives in speech in southern England and in the speech especially of older people in some parts of the United States. It was formerly used in literature, and was a standard variant in our dictionaries from 1828 until 1934. In 2009, the standard forms are run/ran/(have)run. The verb run has numerous meanings. Here are only a few: move faster than walking The children ran all the way home. operate My father has run the family business for fifty years. be in charge of Miss Jones runs the secretarial pool. seek office Ralph Nader has run for President several times. flee The indicted murderer skipped bail and ran. go back and forth This bus runs from here to the airport every two hours. to thread or penetrate The electrician ran a wire from the kitchen to the basement. His helper ran a splinter into his thumb. to publish The Gazette ran my sons story in the early edition. As a noun run has plenty of meanings as well. Here are a few: the act of running He went for a three mile run. a score in baseball How many runs does our team have so far? a term in football Tommy scored a 10-yard run. a sustained effort Hes making another run for the White House. a unit of production This is the books first run. a series of something Hes had a run of unfortunate relationships. The Mousetrap had a very long run in London. Weve had a run of bad weather. excessive withdrawals Economic turmoil led to a run on banks. normal kind These are not the usual run of first graders. freedom of movement We give our cats the run of the house. an enclosure for animals The dogs stay in the run. a flaw in knitted fabric These stockings have too many runs in them. Idioms with run to have the runs experience diarrhea to run around be sexually promiscuous to run around with associate with to run across discover by chance to run after seek someones company to run a tight ship manage strictly to run circles around demonstrate superiority to run interference for smooth the way for another person run-off 1. rain water (and other precipitation) drained by creeks and rivers 2. an election subsequent to a principal election in which no winner could be determined run of the mill ordinary runaround deceptive, evasive treatment of one person by another (When I asked about layoffs, the boss gave me the runaround (i.e., he did not provide a direct answer). on the run evading and hiding from pursuers Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Expressions category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:12 Types of LanguageWriting the Century15 Idioms for Periods of Time

Differential Reproductive Success in the Science of Evolution

Differential Reproductive Success in the Science of Evolution The term differential reproductive success sounds complicated, but it refers to a rather simple idea common in the study of evolution. The term is used when comparing the successful reproduction rates of two groups of individuals in the same generation of a species population, each exhibiting a different genetically determined characteristic or genotype. It is a term that is central to any discussion of natural selection- the cornerstone principle of evolution. Evolutionary scientists might, for example, want to study whether short height or tall height is more conducive to a species continued survival. By documenting how many individuals of each group produces offspring and in what numbers, scientists arrive at a differential reproductive success rate.   Natural Selection From an  evolutionary perspective, the overall goal of any species is to continue to the next generation. The mechanism is ordinarily rather simple:  produce as many offspring as possible to ensure that at least some of them survive to  reproduce and create the next generation. Individuals within the population of a species often compete for food, shelter, and mating partners to make sure that it is their DNA and their traits that are the ones passed down to the next generation to carry on the species. A cornerstone of the theory of evolution is this principle of natural selection. Sometimes called survival  of the fittest, natural selection is the process by which  those individuals with genetic traits better suited to their environments live long enough to reproduce many offspring, thereby passing the genes for those favorable adaptations to the next generation. Those individuals lacking the favorable traits, or possessing unfavorable traits, are likely to die off before they can reproduce, removing their genetic material from the ongoing  gene pool. Comparing Reproductive Success Rates The term differential reproductive success refers to a statistical analysis comparing successful reproduction rates between groups in a given generation of a species- in other words, how many offspring each group of individuals is able to leave behind. The analysis is used to compare two groups holding different variations of the same trait, and it provides evidence of which group is the fittest. If individuals exhibiting variation A of a trait are demonstrated to reach reproductive age more often and produce more offspring than individuals with variation B of the same trait, the differential reproductive success rate allows you to infer that natural selection is at work and that variation A is advantageous- at least for conditions at the time. Those individuals with variation A will deliver more genetic material for that trait to the next generation, making it more likely to persist and carry on to future generations. Variation B, meanwhile, is likely to gradually vanish.   Differential reproductive success can manifest in a number of ways. In some instances, a trait variation might cause individuals to live longer, thereby having more birth events that deliver more offspring to the next generation. Or, it may cause more offspring to be produced with each birth, even though lifespan remains unchanged. Differential reproductive success can be used to study natural selection in any population of any living species, from the largest mammals to the smallest microorganisms. The evolution of certain antibiotic-resistance bacteria is a classic example of natural selection, in which bacteria with a gene mutation making them resistant to drugs gradually replaced bacteria that had no such resistance. For medical scientists, identifying these strains of drug-resistant bacteria (the fittest) involved documenting the differential reproductive success rates between different strains of the bacteria.

PhD proposal Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

PhD proposal - Essay Example My major field is in infection and immunity for which I have received training covering a wide range of practical molecular and cellular laboratory skills that have broad relevance to research in the biosciences. Furthermore, I have solid training and personal development experience in genetics that enhanced my transferable skills and attitude. The search for knowledge is unending. This is the reason why I would like to pursue a PhD in Biomedical Science. My interest in biomedical science and its potential application to contribute knowledge to finding a cure for HIV has played a key role in my pursuit of advanced study. I have been a passionate student and professional medical worker for the past twenty years of my life. Specifically, the challenge of understanding and finding a cure for HIV has been an enduring part of my career such that I am very keen to study this subject in more depth. Since HIV/AIDS affects more than 30 million people worldwide, the impact of a better, more available, and cheaper cure will definitely send ripples of positivism across the globe. I think that utilizing natural microflora and bacteria to fight the AIDS virus is a novel idea that is worth dedicated research effort. By proving this hypothesis to be right, microbiological agents to fight the AIDS virus can be discovered and designed. The success of this approach can save millions of AIDS patients around the world. Moreover, the knowledge and training that I will gain as an outcome of this endeavour will be advantageous for the institution that I currently work for as microbiology laboratory technician. Presently, no one else is working on this type of project. The skills and the networks that I will build will enhance the capacity of my institution in this aspect of research. Furthermore, as a PhD degree holder, I will be able to lead research studies that will allow me to build up on the very areas that I am

Clorox vs. Shout Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2750 words

Clorox vs. Shout - Term Paper Example Thus it is necessary for the company to identify its strengths and weaknesses in order to develop strategies to improve its market share and sales and thus gain competitive advantage over its competitors. Its strengths are that is enjoys customer loyalty and give back to the community thus good reputation. The weakness of Clorox is that it is a small company concentrated only in a small region of the global market. SC Johnson on the other hand enjoys the strength of having its products all over the global market. However they have a disadvantage that they do no give back to the community and have limited customer loyalty. The recommendations that Clorox Company can implement in order to achieve competitive advantage of the product category market include strategic marketing, innovations and expansions of its operations and products into new markets so as to gain global market value and dominate it as well. Market Analysis of Product Category The bleach market globally is expected to have a value of $2.6 billion which is an increase from 2008 by 0.7%. Americans alone accounts for almost 50% of the global market value of the bleach while the Clorox contribute 28.5% share of bleach’s global market value. ... Hence its existence for more than six generations has helped in gaining customer loyalty and confidence which gives them advantage over their competitors like Sc Johnson. The product category have been recording increased sales over the years however currently due to economic crisis consumers tend to go for the products that are cheaper and economical. Due to presence of some chemicals in the product category, Clorox Company decided to introduce green products as a market strategy to improve sales and lure the consumers since nowadays everyone wants to go green and protect the environment. This was done in 2008 and for the first few years the sales increased enormously (Thomas, 58). However when the global recession crept in the sales started declining because people prefer to buy the normal Clorox which is lower in price as compared to the green option. At the end of the day consumers want to promote environmental protection but not at a higher cost. Clorox Company is relatively sma ll as compared to SC Johnson and it commands mostly domestic market unlike SC Johnson which commands global market. This has give SC Johnson an advantage over Clorox since they cover almost all countries in the world. This has given challenge to Clorox and currently they are putting together strategies that can help them expand and they are especially eyeing the Canadian market. The household market is growing quite rapidly and thus other companies are gaining market value globally at the expense of Clorox Company. Market analysis of the product category shows that there a variety of cleaning products in the market. Many companies have invaded the household cleaning products market thus quite a number of cleaning products for the consumer to chose

Creationism vs Evolutionism Essay Example for Free

Creationism vs Evolutionism Essay From the beginning of time there has been a controversy about how the world was created. At this time we can agree that there can only be one of two ways that the world could have been created, and that is scientifically or non scientifically. While in the world today mostly everything is being created from science although that might not have been the case back in the days. In this research paper I will try to show the difference between the two and how they are still one in the same. While this research paper is not designed to persuade you in your beliefs, it is a bucket of knowledge that will better educate you on the two. The Creationism vs. Evolutionism controversy represents a clash between two ways of relating to the world (scientific/non-scientific). The central idea of biological evolution (scientific) is that all life on Earth shares a common ancestor, just as you and your cousins share a common grandmother. Creationism (non-scientific) is someone who believes in a god who is absolute creator of heaven and earth, out of nothing, by an act of free will. Creationists do not believe that all of today’s living things evolved from simple organisms changing slowly over time. Creationism opposes the idea of human evolution. (Ruse, Michael, fall 2008) Since the creation of the universe is typically explained by two popular beliefs. One being the scientific explanation and the other being biblical explanation. These are two very different explanations, and while I believe ones religious beliefs can have a role in which explanation one chooses to follow, one is free to choose how they believe the world was created. The scientific explanation is explained by the Big Bang Theory. A basic definition of the Big Bang Theory is that the universe began at a specific time and has been cooling and expanding ever since. According to this explanation, a hot ball of energy expanded outward in all directions and in time radiation and matter began to rise. Gravity now comes in to play and draws the matter into dense regions. After billions of years this formed all things that exist now, stars, planets and galaxies. In our text the biblical explanation for the creation of the universe is explained to us through the Judeo-Christian Biblical account of the creation of earth. The Judeo-Christian account is believed that God made its first inhabitants, fashioning them out of clay, and breathing life into them. With this theory it is obvious to see the two explanations; scientific and biblical are very different. Scientific belief is the universe was created through hot energy expanding and eventually creating our galaxies. The biblical explanation is the belief of the Holy Spirit (God) created all things. With these two very different explanations I dont see how they can become reconciled. Being of Pentecostal faith, I was taught, and brought up to believe in the biblical explanation. However, one cannot ignore the scientific explanation. With the research given today it’s hard to deny the scientific facts available. For some it can be difficult picking one explanation if they don’t believe in religion, for me, I can believe is that the world was created by (god) and the continued creation that came there after over time is created through science. Creationism vs. volutionism has often been incorrectly drawn out as a debate between science and religion, very little can be gained by debating evolution vs. creationism. Two of the biggest obstacles to effective debate on the topic are: †¢The lack of conclusive scientific evidence to forever resolve the issue †¢And the lack of open mindedness on the part of both camps. The geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky stated that, nothing in biology makes sense except in terms of evolution. The theory of evolution merely explains a process by which species undergoes change over an extended period of time. It is believed that different species evolved from a common ancestor. In order to understand the concept of evolution we must think of time in large units like millions of years. Blocks of time like months and years are of little significance. Evolution refers to entire populations and not individuals. The changes must be passed on to the next generation. Though not the first person to present the idea of evolution; Charles Darwin has been dubbed the father of evolution. He is the most noted and supported, for his theory of natural selection. Darwin’s theory of natural selection simply states that nature favors the survival of organisms that have traits that are best suited for their environment. In other words, only the strong survive. (Max O. Hallman third edition pp 159- 166) Since Darwin’s proposal, scientists such as geologist, biologists, biochemists and others have conducted studies, gathered evidence and developed theories to explain the probable mechanisms of evolution. Modifications are constantly being made to findings and theories as new evidence is accepted. These scientists have conducted studies to compare organisms. Their research includes the study of fossil records, cell structure and function, DNA and the process of heredity (ancestral background). Their theory of evolution suggests that species that currently exist on earth, developed from ancestral species that have adapted to changing conditions. Scientist evidence suggests that life on earth probably began billions of years ago with a unicellular organism. This information has been obtained through Radio-carbon dating which is a method of obtaining age estimates on organic materials. It has been used to date samples as old as 50,000 years. The method was developed immediately following World War II by Willard F. Libby and coworkers, and has provided age determinations in archaeology, geology, geophysics and other branches of science. Radiocarbon determinations can be obtained on wood; charcoal; marine and fresh-water shell; bone and antler; peat and organic-bearing sediments, carbonate deposits such as tufa, caliche, and marl; and dissolved carbon dioxide and carbonates in ocean, lake and ground-water sources. Darwin hypothesized that changes in species is due to the concept of natural selection (only the strong survive). Organisms with favorable traits to those environments are more likely to survive, reproducing and passing on the better traits to the next generation. The new off spring world have an increased chance of survival. Over time, the fittest of the species will survive with different characteristics from those of the original species. This will now be recognized as a new species. (William P. marryA. cunningham chapter 4. Pp 75-90) While absolute proof of the existence of God cannot be realized by any human being, the great weight of evidence, when rationally evaluated, clearly balances the scales heavily in favor of God. We can demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that He is, and that He is a rewarded of them that diligently seek Him. (Hebrews 11:6) Creationism is the religious belief that all life on earth is the creation of a supernatural being- god. This relates to the history of religion as described in religious text and the bible. As described in genesis, humans, the world, the universe and all that exists was created by god: Creatio ex nihilo- Latin for creation from nothing.

Ontological Shift :: essays research papers

Ontological Shift   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚     Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In Michael Heim’s essay â€Å"The Cyber Space Dialectic†, he discusses how our culture is going through an ontological shift fashioned by the Internet. Heim articulates his theory of what dialectic is and how this ontological shift is creating a new dialectic. The Internet is the main place today where people from all over the world exchange and communicate their ideas and feelings. The Internet is a new community in itself. The ontological shift into the cyberspace times will change the way we think, and the way we act; it will change our overall sense of being. These change that Heim calls an â€Å"ontological shift† has brought on questions about changing society. These are similar to the questions that Peter Drucker and Benjamin Barber brought up when they discussed about creating a new society. Will society benefit from this new society in which its central being is cyberspace? This is a serious question since we are living in the phase t hat is changing into the cyber world now. How will this change affect this new technologically inclined society?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  We have all used the Internet to talk to other people, either using chat or emails. We converse with people with different backgrounds and cultures. When interacting with different types of people, it means that we are working in groups and collaborating. This is what the Internet is all about. Interacting with each other in new ways, and learning how to open yourself to other points of views and new ideas. In his essay Heim states, â€Å"Computer networks foster virtual communities that cut across geography time zones. Virtual community seems a cure-all for isolated people who complain about their isolation. Locked in metal boxes on urban freeways, a population enjoys socializing with fellow humans through computer networks†(Heim 374). As Heim explains in his essay, the Internet can bring together communities that are isolated from the rest of the world. It helps communities and different types of people communicate with each other. It creates the idea of group work through computer networks. This was also one theme in Barbers essay; Group work is what makes ideas carry through and productive. In Barber’s â€Å"Making Civil Society Real† he states, â€Å"Civic responsibility, being a partnership between government, civil society, and the private market necessarily depends on the active collaboration of political leaders, citizens and business people†(Barber 106). Our responsibility as a society is to collaborate our selves with all the groups that make this society function.